Peg-o-Leg's Ramblings


Home | Pages | Archives


When Synonyms Are Not Synonymous

April 5, 2012 7:30 am

A rose by any other name...might be a dandelion.

Here’s a post you may have missed last January.

They say that people judge us by the words we use.  It is equally true that we show our own judgments by the words we choose.  Words can carry more baggage than the carousel at O’Hare Airport. 


It never ceases to amaze me how supposedly impartial reporters manage to get their personal biases across, oh so subtly, with their choice of words.

As these examples from http://thesaurus.com show, words that are technically synonymous can have different meanings, loaded with praise or criticism.   (Synonyms are shown in bold italics.)

Criticism: This rather negative term might be replaced with the observation of a neutral bystander, the more admiring appreciation, or a stern judgment rendered by a magistrate in robes and wig.  

Thrifty:  With its brother, prudent, this is a desirable trait.  How different from the mean-spirited, Silas Marner connotations of penny-pinching or close-fisted.

Wealthy: Something most of us would like to be, it goes along with the reassuring comfortable and admiring independent.  To the envious this is having it made, but made of money and rolling in it might be said with a slight sneer.  

 – Chubby:  A somewhat tolerant view of adipose, this is midway between the complimentary zaftig and disapproving tubby or fatty.

 – Investment:  This term, much in the political news lately, implies a prudent expenditure with an expectation of return almost reaching the level of a loan.   Others might classify money spent as a plain old expense.  Speculation is more risky and vested interests are self-serving.

 – Funny: Those of us toiling in the humor vineyards love this adjective, along with its clever cousin, witty. We might sometimes go for out-of-control hysterical, but rarely want to wear the foolish tag of silly.  

Rant:  This implies a lack of logic and/or self-control.  An advocate might stump or declaim, which is a more reasonable enthusiasm.  It takes an elder statesman to orate.

Ladywoman who exudes propriety.  She runs the gamut from a queen on her throne, to a dolla plaything.  Some might call her a bitch.  I don’t need to explain what that implies.

Having a large vocabulary lets us express our thoughts precisely.   Our choices, however, often say just as much about us as they do about the topic.

The subtle nuances of word choice speak volumes to an attentive listener.

Posted by pegoleg

Categories: General Ramblings

Tags: , , , , , , ,

33 Responses to “When Synonyms Are Not Synonymous”

  1. I could spend hours playing in a thesaurus. Does that make me weird, strange, odd or just special?

    Like

    By bigsheepcommunications on April 5, 2012 at 7:41 am

    1. Very, very special, Lisa.

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 8:55 am

  2. I just posted on another site how I love words, I love how they twist and lay together and they tell a story even when you are doing nothing more than laying out facts.

    Like

    By ghostofawriter on April 5, 2012 at 7:59 am

    1. Well said!

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 8:56 am

  3. Echoing your last line … we have a wealth of words to use; choose wisely.
    Brilliant, Peg.

    Like

    By Lenore Diane on April 5, 2012 at 8:02 am

    1. My father-in-law had an enviable vocabulary, and one of his favorite pastimes was perusing the dictionary. We used to have friendly debates on the wisdom of using words he KNEW his listener did not know. His view was that he was going for precision – to say EXACTLY what he wanted. I maintained that the point of communication is to communicate.

      We have his dictionary and sometimes when I’m leafing through it I come up with a note in his handwriting, God rest his soul.

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:00 am

  4. Great post, but in your last line you said almost word for word, what I was going to use for my comment. So now I’m just left with, Yeah, what you said! Which doesn’t say much for me, but I’ll make it a point to do better next time! But I still can say have a great day Peg, and mean it sincerely. 😀

    Like

    By Chris Sheridan on April 5, 2012 at 8:26 am

    1. I think it shows that great minds think alike, Chris!

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:01 am

  5. This lady is a tramp, fo’ shizzle. Sorry. I’ve spent the morning watching Disney movies while listening to gangster rap. I’m a bit confused 🙂

    Like

    By Tori Nelson on April 5, 2012 at 8:52 am

    1. I smell a blog post here, Tori. Disney rap, featuring the Princess in the Hood – the next big thing.

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:01 am

  6. I will always remember a person of influence uttering “I think we have them under control.” In choosing “them”, the group referred to was completely singled out, isolated, marginalized, not included in the solution to the problem, not to mention the “under control” part. Is my comment a rant? Fullstop, as the English would say, er ‘nuf said. Great post. You got me going there.

    Like

    By georgettesullins on April 5, 2012 at 8:55 am

    1. I especially notice this with the press. Sometimes the sheer weight of editorial buried in the question itself is staggering. This subtle bias is also shown by the location of a story in a paper – front page news, or Section E after the garage sale ads?

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:04 am

  7. This may come as a surprise, but I love words. I still have my ol’ beat up dictionary from high school. I would spend many lonely hours sifting through it. Does this make me look sad? pathetic? lugubrious? All three?

    Like

    By She's a Maineiac on April 5, 2012 at 9:18 am

    1. That doesn’t come as a surprise at all. You have to love words to wield them as well as you do!

      Funny you should mention lugubrious. One of our mutual friends was asking, just the other day, did I think you seemed lugubrious lately? I said “No, more dolorous, really.”

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:31 am

      1. And I would say to our mutual friend, why no, not at all. More lachrymose.

        Like

        By She's a Maineiac on April 5, 2012 at 9:41 am

        1. (Having a vision of the two of us, half a continent apart, hunched over our various dictionaries and cackling like a couple of crack-nerds.)

          Like

          By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 9:52 am

          1. We sure do know how to cavort and gambol!

            Like

            By She's a Maineiac on April 5, 2012 at 10:00 am

        2. Like a dyad of immature, flocculent, quadrupedal ruminants on a verdant lea.

          Like

          By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 10:13 am

          1. Huh?

            uh…I mean, yes! You took the words right outta my head.

            But surely you meant more velutinous than flocculent.

            Like

            By She's a Maineiac on April 5, 2012 at 11:45 am

        3. You’re probably right, Darla. Even though everyone KNOWS what flocculent means, it does sound suspiciously like a condition one would need either a Tums or a Viagra for, doesn’t it?

          Like

          By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 1:57 pm

  8. And now, I present, the telling comment of the day:
    ‘You write good, Peg.’
    Thank you. This has been, the telling comment of the day.
    🙂

    Like

    By spilledinkguy on April 5, 2012 at 11:59 am

    1. Thank you, Telling Comment Guy.

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 1:58 pm

  9. I love this post, Peg! Adore it. Cherish it. Admire it. I’m almost infatuated.

    Like

    By gojulesgo on April 5, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    1. But I was going for smitten…fail. Damn!

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 1:59 pm

  10. As a former English Major I appreciate this post.

    Like

    By andreatatiana on April 5, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    1. And I esteem your appreciation!

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 5, 2012 at 2:06 pm

  11. And this from the master of the double entendre!

    Like

    By Al on April 5, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    1. Takes one to know one!

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 6, 2012 at 10:33 am

  12. I wasn’t blogging last year at this time, so thanks for re-posting this. Loved it!

    Like

    By Lorna's Voice on April 6, 2012 at 10:20 am

    1. Thanks! I think most bloggers love words and what they can do, don’t we?

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 6, 2012 at 10:34 am

  13. Who needs a thesaurus when you can make up words? It’s a flibburry time waster to look up words…besides you have to know how to spell. Great post. Keep jivhobbing, PegO.

    Like

    By Barb on April 7, 2012 at 1:51 pm

    1. You make a great point, Barb! I was going for a bliddlefub vibe, as opposed to jivhobbing, but thanks.

      Like

      By pegoleg on April 9, 2012 at 9:12 am

  14. English is indeed rich with not-quite-synonyms. I often wonder how non-natives handle them. I’ve done a bit of language ranting of my own, if anyone cares to look:
    http://kitchenmudge.wordpress.com/tag/language/

    Like

    By kitchenmudge on April 15, 2012 at 6:17 pm

Leave a Reply



Mobile Site | Full Site


Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.